<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The use of the chair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dodman.org/archives/42/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dodman.org/archives/42</link>
	<description>All flesh is as grass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dod</title>
		<link>http://blog.dodman.org/archives/42/comment-page-1#comment-28137</link>
		<dc:creator>dod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dodman.org/?p=42#comment-28137</guid>
		<description>Hello Magdalena,

Thanks for your kind words. It&#039;s gratifying to know you&#039;ve benefited from some of the things I&#039;ve written. 

Virtually every time I write about the Technique it&#039;s done primarily to help explain it to myself. What I mean is, I start out not really knowing what I believe about an issue, or having only a rough notion of what I think, and I usually end up with a clear (or clearer) understanding. I find it very helpful, and I&#039;m glad when others do, too.

I&#039;m still searching for greater clarity, because what the Technique is can seem vague, and this is often encouraged by the use of &#039;key&#039; words, that are assumed to mean the same thing to everyone, but usually don&#039;t.

Nicholas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Magdalena,</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words. It&#8217;s gratifying to know you&#8217;ve benefited from some of the things I&#8217;ve written. </p>
<p>Virtually every time I write about the Technique it&#8217;s done primarily to help explain it to myself. What I mean is, I start out not really knowing what I believe about an issue, or having only a rough notion of what I think, and I usually end up with a clear (or clearer) understanding. I find it very helpful, and I&#8217;m glad when others do, too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still searching for greater clarity, because what the Technique is can seem vague, and this is often encouraged by the use of &#8216;key&#8217; words, that are assumed to mean the same thing to everyone, but usually don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Nicholas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magdalena Portmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.dodman.org/archives/42/comment-page-1#comment-28134</link>
		<dc:creator>Magdalena Portmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dodman.org/?p=42#comment-28134</guid>
		<description>Dear Nicholas,
I have found your blog most helpful indeed! I have had quite a struggle with the chairwork (as a teacher). At times, it felt more like an exercise for myself: practicing getting people in and out of a chair - a lot of end gaining involved there! - so for a while I abandoned it (or rather the chair, but that brought its own problems). Since reading your articles, I have managed to bring back chair work, feel happier with it, and am at least able to put it in a wider context for my pupils. I am encouraging my pupils to play with their hinges, without loosing the feet (keeping a good sense of the floor supporting them and the floor taking the weight). The play element seems to help avoid the alexandroid stiffness.

By the way, I qualified as an Alexander Technique teacher in July 08 and have been teaching for just one and a half years. At times, I ask myself how one can teach this thing at all.... I have also been quite preoccupied with the mind/body separation - the linguistic problem of the separation - the absence of a language that does not separate them - the whole notion of psycophysical unity. Whilst pondering this issue, I came across a review by you of Theodore Dimon&#039;s book &quot;The Undivided Self&quot;. The review prompted me to get the book (you are right - not easy reading, but then he is treating a most difficult concept) - and via that route found your web site. I read your articles and essays with great interest - have found your writing very direct, honest, challenging, astute - you manage to write with clarity about issues that are rather complex, and you are careful not to become wishywashy (sorry - I cannot think of another term) when things get difficult. So: many thanks for your writings!
Magdalena
P.S. and best wishes for 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nicholas,<br />
I have found your blog most helpful indeed! I have had quite a struggle with the chairwork (as a teacher). At times, it felt more like an exercise for myself: practicing getting people in and out of a chair &#8211; a lot of end gaining involved there! &#8211; so for a while I abandoned it (or rather the chair, but that brought its own problems). Since reading your articles, I have managed to bring back chair work, feel happier with it, and am at least able to put it in a wider context for my pupils. I am encouraging my pupils to play with their hinges, without loosing the feet (keeping a good sense of the floor supporting them and the floor taking the weight). The play element seems to help avoid the alexandroid stiffness.</p>
<p>By the way, I qualified as an Alexander Technique teacher in July 08 and have been teaching for just one and a half years. At times, I ask myself how one can teach this thing at all&#8230;. I have also been quite preoccupied with the mind/body separation &#8211; the linguistic problem of the separation &#8211; the absence of a language that does not separate them &#8211; the whole notion of psycophysical unity. Whilst pondering this issue, I came across a review by you of Theodore Dimon&#8217;s book &#8220;The Undivided Self&#8221;. The review prompted me to get the book (you are right &#8211; not easy reading, but then he is treating a most difficult concept) &#8211; and via that route found your web site. I read your articles and essays with great interest &#8211; have found your writing very direct, honest, challenging, astute &#8211; you manage to write with clarity about issues that are rather complex, and you are careful not to become wishywashy (sorry &#8211; I cannot think of another term) when things get difficult. So: many thanks for your writings!<br />
Magdalena<br />
P.S. and best wishes for 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
