Category: General
Carpenter has written – Of all the hard facts of science, I know of none more solid and fundamental than the fact that if you inhibit thought (and persevere) you come at length to a region of consciousness below or behind thought, and different from ordinary thought in its nature and character. It is a consciousness of a quasi-universal quality, and a realisation of an altogether vaster self than that to which we are accustomed.
A Year in the Life
An illustrated book for children.
Fragments of a Rainy Season
I caught a chance hour and a half of John Cale (and ex wife Rise) on German satellite TV singing all the songs from Fragments of a Rainy Season in what looked like a small, smoky, crowded club. I was so transfixed I didn’t even think of recording it. I’ve been trying to locate a video ever since. This album is an equisite portrait of one of the best artists around singing and playing the pick of his own songs (plus one beauty from Leonard Cohen) from the past twenty years, accompanied by himself on piano or guitar. The original “unplugged”. Delicious.
Johnny English
Okay, the ‘plot’ is banal, but Rowan Atkinson makes this film hugely enjoyable. Me, Myself and Irene was dire but it was redeeemed by one thirty second scene (dry mouth in the police station). Johnny English has several such breath sapping moments; and even without them, it’s still fun. Puerile, in parts; but that’s the human condition, isn’t it? I loved it. The extras are a bit on the limp side, though.
John Cale at Brighton 16 Jan 2004
Having seen John Cale at St Luke’s without the benefit of knowing Hobosapiens back to front, familiarity with the new songs meant I enjoyed Brighton ten times more. The set list was similar, though no Hallelujah, nor Cordoba. In fact, it was almost identical to the others posted recently.
Queuing to get in, I was worried only a smattering of people would turn up. In the end, Continue reading “John Cale at Brighton 16 Jan 2004”
Music for a new society
This is undoubtedly John Cale’s second best album of his career – after Paris 1919 – and it beats hands down most music from any era for sheer, stirring emotion. That’s what I think, anyway. Of course, I love all Cale’s music, so I am biased; but give the guy a chance and you might come to realise how good he is, too.
Looking for proof
This is a copy of an newspaper article by Jonathan Petre about Near Death Experiences.
Soul-searching doctors find life after death
The first scientific study of “near-death” experiences has found new evidence to suggest that consciousness or the “soul” can continue to exist after the brain has ceased to function.
The findings by two eminent doctors, based on a year-long study of heart attack survivors, could provoke fresh controversy over that most profound of questions: is there life after death?
Reports of “near-death” experiences, in which people close to death have vivid encounters with bright lights and heavenly beings, date back centuries, but the phenomenon has been treated with scepticism by most academics.
The new study concludes, however, that a number of people have almost certainly had these experiences after they were pronounced clinically dead. This would suggest that the mind or consciousness can survive the death of the brain – a conclusion that was hailed by clerics last night as supporting religious faith.
Bishop Stephen Sykes, the professor of theology at Durham University and chairman of the Church of England’s Doctrine Commission, said the findings were “absolutely fascinating”. He added: “I do not find them surprising, however, as I believe life is much more mysterious than we usually think it is. For theologians, the soul is far more than consciousness or the mind. But these findings challenge the crude idea that when a person’s brain dies, that, as far as the person’s existence is concerned, is that.”
The Bishop of Basingstoke, the Rt Rev Geoffrey Rowell, another commission member, said: “These near-death experiences counter the materialist view that we are nothing more than computers made of meat.”
Based on interviews with survivors of heart attacks at Southampton General Hospital’s cardiac unit, the new study is to be published in the respected medical journal Resuscitation next year.
The study’s authors, Dr Peter Fenwick, a consultant neuropsychiatrist at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, and Dr Sam Parnia, a clinical research fellow and registrar at Southampton hospital, stress that more research is needed.
Dr Parnia said: “These people were having these experiences when we wouldn’t expect them to happen, when the brain shouldn’t be able to sustain lucid processes or allow them to form memories that would last. So it might hold an answer to the question of whether mind or consciousness is actually produced by the brain or whether the brain is a kind of intermediary for the mind, which exists independently.”
Dr Fenwick said: “If the mind and brain can be independent, then that raises questions about the continuation of consciousness after death. It also raises the question about a spiritual component to humans and about a meaningful universe with a purpose rather than a random universe.”
During the study period, 63 cardiac arrest patients survived and were interviewed within a week. Of those, 56 had no recollection of their period of unconsciousness, a result that might have been expected in all cases.
Seven survivors, however, had memories, although only four passed the Grayson scale, the strict medical criteria for assessing near-death experiences.
These four recounted feelings of peace and joy, time speeded up, heightened senses, lost awareness of body, seeing a bright light, entering another world, encountering a mystical being and coming to a “point of no return”. Three of them described themselves as non-practising Anglicans while the fourth was a lapsed Roman Catholic.
By examining medical records, the researchers said the contention of many critics that near-death experiences were the result of a collapse of brain functions caused by lack of oxygen were highly unlikely. None of those who underwent the experiences had low levels of oxygen.
Researchers were also able to rule out claims that unusual combinations of drugs were to blame because the resuscitation procedure in the hospital unit was the same in every case.
Dr Parnia, who was trained at the Guys and St Thomas’ medical school, University of London, said: “I started off as a sceptic but, having weighed up all the evidence, I now think that there is something going on. Essentially, it comes back to the question of whether the mind or consciousness is produced from the brain. If we can prove that the mind is produced by the brain, I don’t think there is anything after we die because essentially we are conscious beings.
“If, on the contrary, the brain is like an intermediary which manifests the mind, like a television will act as an intermediary to manifest waves in the air into a picture or a sound, we can show that the mind is still there after the brain is dead. And that is what I think these near-death experiences indicate.”
Christopher French, a reader in psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London, said he had not seen the new study but remained sceptical. “Near-death experiences could be pointing towards the soul or the mind leaving the body, but they could just be the brain trying to make sense of what is a very unusual event,” he said.
John Cale concert at St Luke’s 26 Nov 2003
This was a live concert recorded by BBC4 at an atmospheric church in Islington.
I went to this show with my brother and our respective wives. We were both very familiar with all of Cale’s stuff except Hobosapiens which neither of us had heard. The ladies ‘knew’ Hallelujah and that was about it.
The setting was small, intimate, theatre sized, in a converted church. Cale dressed in white the first half, black the second. He played a lot of new songs, which sounded like they were first class, strongly melodic, arresting lyrically; but I found it hard to properly appreciate what I was hearing for the first time. His versions of familiar songs were either good (Andulacia, Fear, Cable Hogue), great (Hallulujah, Chinese Envoy, E is missing, Ship of Fools, Thoughtless Kind), or poor (Paris 1919). There were probably others I’ve forgotten. The best by far for me was Chinese Envoy. Haunting. I would have travelled twice the distance (70 miles) just to hear him sing that.
The ladies were awed by Cale’s sheer stage presence and were amazed he was in his sixties. So was I, frankly. As they admitted, if I had said he was 35 they would have had no difficulty believing me. My wife felt he had a ‘hard’ face; not someone to meet on a dark night; but I thought I saw his vulnerable side.
Personally, I preferred it when Cale played acoustic guitar, alone; or the band was muted; as in the two encores. There were some truly great moments; but there was a bit too much ‘rock’ for me. Having said that, I’m aware Cale’s been touring alone for years with just a guitar and piano so he has every reason for wanting to branch out.
Having never seen him live before (my brother saw him at Oxford, during his masked, ‘punk’ days) I’m planning to catch him again at Brighton in December. I’ll make sure I’ve heard Hobosapiens about a hundred times first, though.
Obviously, I can’t compare this to other Cale concerts; so I would be interested to hear what those who can thought of it. For me, it was a great performance, full of energy, with some lovely touches, from someone who is a true original. There’s simply no one remotely like John Cale. I’m sure when I hear him again in a couple of months I’ll appreciate that even more.
John Cale at Brighton 16 Jan 2004
This was Cale’s last show on his European tour.
Having seen John Cale at St Luke’s without the benefit of knowing Hobosapiens back to front, familiarity with the new songs meant I enjoyed Brighton ten times more. The set list was similar, though no Hallelujah, nor Cordoba. In fact, it was almost identical to the others posted recently.
Queuing to get in, I was worried only a smattering of people would turn up. In the end, a respectable number half filled the Dome. It was a curious mix of young and old, weird and very ordinary looking. It could have been a model train collector’s seminar.
I sat near the front; but as soon as the music started I headed closer to the stage. That was definitely the place to be.
I thought the entire set was musically pretty tight, and song seemed to follow song seamlessly. There was very little talking, or introductions: the songs spoke for themselves.
Over the years, I’ve got so used to hearing musically simple – just piano or acoustic guitar – versions of most of John Cale’s truly amazing back catalogue I found I preferred the recent songs to those I knew almost as well as childhood nursery rhymes. Having said that, Chinese Envoy and Andulucia were fantastic. I couldn’t say the same for Paris 1919. The lead guitar interpretation of the pastoral interlude just didn’t do it for me. There were three great screamers: Fear (unbelievable), Cable Hogue and Leaving It Up To You (visceral); they left me wondering at how much strain a throat (or heart) can take.
I would have liked to hear Zen; but Over Her Head, Look Horizon, Magritte, Archimedes, and Things, were all top class. One song stood out above all the others, though, and that was Caravan. This was performed loudly, but started softly, remained beautifully modulated throughout, and rose to its crescendo so sure footedly I was in awe. What a fantastic track it is.
I don’t know how the enthusiasm of the audience compared with other shows on the tour. John seemed happy enough with his reception. I wasn’t yodeling but I was clapping pretty loudly. Clapping above my head, which is rare for me. I did join in the shouts for an encore, but this was always going to happen, since it was used to both introduce and bid farewell to the band members.
What I hope to see one day is John Cale in concert, alone with his electronic keyboard. Sensitive and accomplished though the others were, it was John’s versatility that shone through. What a voice; what lyrics; what an extraordinary performer!
My abiding feeling was astonishment at how somebody so accomplished – a living legend, as I overheard one person say – should attract such a relatively paltry audience; and how fortunate I was to be there
Eco
This letter is about the ability of animals to ‘think’ in a distinctly human fashion.
Dear Marthe Kiley-Worthington,
I read your book "Eco-Agriculture" with great interest, particularly the question of whether, or rather how, animals think. I have long considered the only real difference between us and other animals is our ability to consider in the abstract; and that this ability, which probably began accidentally and has become something of a curse, is all that enabled us to get and stay "on top". However, when I kept animals some years ago I had two very strange experiences which seemed to suggest an intelligence that was almost human.
The first instance was when our geese, which were on a river, were shot at by our neighbour who thought they were wild. Only one pellet hit the target, and it apparently severed something vital in the neck of our gander because from that day on he couldn’t see. Or, at any rate, he gave that appearance. I had to wade into the river to get him back, and he was unaware of me until I touched him. Anyway, he managed to graze and even mate and he lived on uneventfully until one day when the river was in spate he fell in and got swept away. I saw all this happen as I was doing some fencing work at the time. The river was dangerous and I ran along beside him but certainly didn’t intend jumping in myself. One of our geese, however, ran along with me, did jump in, and during the course of the next hour, I followed along beside them as the gander swam around in helpless circles while she patiently tried to get him to go to the side.
In its way it was as involved a piece of rescue work as a dangling man at the end of a rope hanging from a helicopter trying to get a drowning man to do what he wanted. Patience prevailed and the gander was saved, without any intervention from me. How the goose did it, I don’t know. I don’t even know if it was silent, and just involved the endless little indications with her neck and beak that I could see. What baffles me still is how a goose, whose attention span seems so limited in some respects – though not, I suppose, when it comes to remaining sitting on her eggs – should have succeeded in maintaining an "idea" that was clearly not instinctive, and must have involved the relatively complicated abstract process of picturing a desired end result – the gander in safety on the bank – followed by the decision to get into the river herself to help bring this about. The decision must have been made on the basis of "seeing" the gander in the river, "recognising" he was helpless and in danger, "wanting" to help him, "knowing" what to do and "persisting" for nearly an hour with this before "succeeding" in carrying it out!
The second occasion involved our house cow and her calf. The calf had the habit of crossing the river, attracted by our neighbour’s herd of cows on the other side. Often I would go and get her, while the mother stood on our bank bellowing. One time, dusk was falling, I was busy, the mother was bellowing and I could see that her calf was almost a mile away, with the herd of cows, and showing no inclination of coming back on her own. I got my binoculars to check this out and was surpassed to see one cow from the herd repeatedly going up to our calf and nuzzling it in our direction. Several times the calf would begin to walk towards the river, with this cow following behind, just as if she was pushing it along, as I might have done; then the calf would change its mind, and run back to the herd, just as it had done with me on previous occasions; and the cow did what I had had to do, beginning again, in her case nuzzling the calf, edging it away from the other animals, heading it towards the river. This went on for a good half hour, during which time our house cow waited, occasionally bellowing, on our side of the river. Finally, the calf, followed by the cow from the herd, crossed the mile or so between us, until they stood together opposite our house cow. The calf remained hesitant, and it wasn’t until it had been repeatedly but gently "pushed" down the bank – again, exactly what I had had to do on other occasions – that it plucked up the courage to cross the river and be reunited with its mum. It wasn’t until she could see the calf suckling that the cow on the other side of the river – whose own calf had presumably been taken away from her at birth – turned and went back to her herd. Again, I was astonished that this cow should have "known" what was wrong, should have "decided" what to do, and should have persisted in doing it for half an hour or more.
You mention in your book about setting up an Eco-farm in a developing country. I have a potential opportunity for you! About twenty years ago my family bought some land in the Seychelles. It was always used as grazing by a neighbour until the mid 1980’s. Two years ago I got permission to develop it as a fruit/livestock farm. My ideas were based on Permaculture principles: lots of trees, producing fruit, for both humans and animals. We went out there last year, but due to a mix up over land ownership, we weren’t able to do anything so returned to England. Although it may take some time, it now seems we are going to have the land vested back in our name, and that this is going to be made conditional on using it for agriculture.
Agriculture in Seychelles began with settlers from France cutting down most of what was left of the endemic forest and creating plantations of coconut trees. The high land suffers from erosion and the low land from what I would call "percolation" – i.e., all the organic matter simply drains through the sand, once the root webs and leaf fall of the original trees is gone. The last twenty years have seen a quasi Marxist government with lots of State farms trying to emulate modern European agricultural practices with fertiliser applications and large scale vegetable growing and battery houses for chickens and pigs, etc. Meanwhile, more and more fruit and vegetables have to be imported from Kenya and South Africa, and on the island of Praslin, where our land is, agriculture is in a parlous state.
Walking around our land shows the decline in soil fertility. The section near the beach, which hasn’t lost any trees, has soil that is dark brown in colour and remains full of humus right up to the edge of the white sand. Standing there on a hot day one is wonderfully shaded; it is a small forest environment. Further back, there is a large area where all the trees have been cut down – mostly old coconut and casuerina – some of which has been planted to a fodder crop rather like sugarcane, which is cut and used for feeding cattle. Each successive crop of this grass gets yellower and yellower and the land itself, while supporting a matted form of rough grass which is grazed directly by cattle where this special grass is not cultivated, is a greyish/white sand. Next to this block is an area of untouched casuerina plantation which, again, is like a forest; and the soil is dark brown and crumbly to a good depth.
Growing vegetables is a problem since it is difficult to do that beneath trees and as soon as an area is cleared the soil starts to lose fertility. Some Seychellois create "raised beds" – literally – by building platforms out of wood which look rather like trestle tables. Most Seychellois, however, just do without vegetables! Fruit is a different matter, since it is almost always tree fruit and trees seem to grow easily; however, the time lapse between planting and harvesting – although paw-paw, banana, passion fruit etc. only take a year – means few people bother. It is so much easier – or if it isn’t actually easier, it is certainly more acceptable, especially for a people who I suspect find tilling the ground unpleasantly reminiscent of their slave ancestry – to earn the money elsewhere and buy imported fruit, usually apples and oranges from South Africa. Almost all local fruit comes from trees planted many years ago the majority of which are too far from the ground to be harvested.
My feelings have changed a little since living in Seychelles while waiting to get started on this project only to run into apparently insurmountable problems on the land ownership issue; I no longer want to do this on my own. Our family are uninterested, at least in the short term, in any thought of selling their land, but they would be quite happy to consider a form of lease, or partial lease, or any other arrangement, if you were interested in any way in setting up an Eco-farm in what are, I can assure you, very beautiful surroundings, and amongst people who, if not African in nature, are certainly not likely to be as negative minded as those you encountered on Mull!
Please treat this letter and its contents as lightly as you like. It simply represents my passing thoughts after reading your book. Incidentally, during our last month on Praslin – April 1993 – we met an Austrian who had imported his horses onto the island, a mare, a stallion and a foal, I think – very fine looking animals – with the idea of setting up some sort of tourist related enterprise. Unfortunately, he had omitted to obtain a work permit first! So there we were, with our work permit to farm, but no land, and there he was, with his horses, having to rent the land he was using for grazing – very similar plateau land to ours – but no permission to "use" the horse. (On La Digue and Mahe, the other two inhabited island, there are also horses, mostly used for tourist trekking, I think.)
I could go into more detail if you wanted. I would, by the way, be keen to know how your student training scheme works; and whether it is possible to visit your farm.